MIND & WORLD 4. 1. DILEMMA MYTH OF FRICTIONELESS THE GIVEN BASED UPON EVANS DAVIDSON SPINNING IN THE VOID FRICTION = CAUSAL
MIND & WORLD 3. 1. BALD NATURALISM: DENIES THAT THE SPONTANEITY OF UNDERSTANDING IS SUI GENERIS IN THE WAY SUGGESTED BY THE LINK TO THE IDEA OF FREEDOM. p. 67, r. 22.
MIND & WORLD 3. 1. AANNAME GEDEELD DOOR Gareth Evans EN DAVIDSON: the content of perceptual experience is (extra) non-conceptual.
MIND & WORLD 4.2 Mensen delen perceptual sensitivity met dieren. Geen factoring out maar mensen zijn permeated with sensitivity. Cf. Wittgenstein in de PI.
MIND & WORLD 4.2 De vergelijking met dieren dwingt ons niet om spontaneity te scheiden van intuitions
MIND & WORLD 4.2 Citaat p. 70. r. 3-11
MIND & WORLD 4.2 Cruciale vraag: Heeft menselijke sentience een plaats in de natuur?
MIND & WORLD 4.3 Weber, J. S. Mill, Dilthey Erklären/verstehen Naturwissenschaften/Geisteswissenschaften Verklaren/begrijpen (interpreteren)
MIND & WORLD III 4 Natural Realm of law verklaring sensibility Logical space of reasons rechtvaardiging experience
MIND & WORLD 4. 2 Onderscheid: realm of law/space of reasons vormde voruitgang op middeleeuwse wetenschap. Maar vormt experiential conceptual content niet een RE-ENCHANTMENT OF THE NATURAL WORLD?
MIND & WORLD III 4 KRITIEK MCDOWELL OP EVANS: THE PUTATIVELY RATIONAL RELATIONS BETWEEN EXPERIENCES AND JUDGEMENTS CANNOT THEMSELVES BE WITHIN THE SCOPE OF SPONTANEITY, AND THEREFORE CANNOT BE REASON-CONSTITUTING. P. 52, R. 28
MIND & WORLD 4.2 Lezen: understanding naturalistically p. 72/3
MIND & WORLD 4.2 STATUS OF SPONTANEITY BALD NATURALISM REENCHANTMENT OF NATURE NATURAL REALM OF LAW DAVIDSON: NATURAL = REALM OF LAW
MIND & WORLD 4. 3 BALD NATURALISM SPONTANEITY WORDT VERKLAARD DOOR DE NATUURWETENSCHAPPEN REDUCTIONISME Lezen: p. 73, r. 15
MIND & WORLD 4.3 Naturalism includes meaning, but reduces it.
MIND & WORLD 3 5 Oppositie tegen bald naturalism : Contrast nature/space of reasons is terecht. Betekenis kan niet gereduceerd worden tot nature.
MIND & WORLD 4.3. ANTI- RECUTIONISME TEGEN ENGE CONCEPTIE VAN NATURE
MIND & WORLD 4.3. ANTI- RECUTIONISME DAVIDSON SPONTANEITY SUI GENERIS Lezen: p. 74, r. 16 - law
MIND & WORLD 4.3. ANTI- RECUTIONISME Verschil tussen McDowell en Davidson: Davidson: anomaal monisme Lezen p. 74/5 2e alinea tot r. 15
MIND & WORLD 4.3. Davidson locates concepts in the realm of law, in nature, because he equates them with natural events. McDowell wants to leave concepts in nature as a sui generis category. Lezen p. 76 bovenaan.
MIND & WORLD 4.5. BAlD NATURALISM: Spontaneity is sui generis, therefore it does not exist in nature (realm of law)
MIND & WORLD 4.6. Probleem: Past spontaneity wel in de natuur? RAMPANT PLATONISM Space of reasons as autnomous structure Cf. platonisme in de filosofie van de wiskunde (Paul Bernays)
MIND & WORLD 3 6 THEREFORE: EXPERIENCES DISPOSITIONS TO JUDGE EXPERIENCES BELIEFS EXPERIENCES CONCEPTUAL
MIND & WORLD 3 6 MCDOWELL: EXPERIENCES INDEED NO DISPOSITIONS TO MAKE JUDGEMENTS. DISPOSITIONS ARE ACTUALIZATIONS OF POTENTIALITIES, AND EXPERIENCES AREN T LIKE THAT
MIND & WORLD 3 6 MCDOWELL: EXPERIENCES ARE ALREADY ACTUALIZATIONS OF CONCEPTUAL CAPACITIES. THE LINK (PERCEPTIONS -> THINKING) IS NOT CETERIS PARIBUS BUT REASON-GIVING.
MIND & WORLD III 4 LEZEN P. 53, R. 4-16. THE RELATIONS BETWEEN EXPERIENCES AND JUDGEMENTS ARE BEING CONCEIVED TO MEET INCONSISTENT DEMANDS: TO BE SUCH AS TO FIT EXPERIENCES TO BE REASONS FOR JUDGEMENTS, WHILE BEING OUTSIDE THE REACH OF RATIONAL ENQUIRY.