Amsterdam A10 Case Study Lelylaan, 29 June 2016

Transcriptie

1 Amsterdam A10 Case Study Lelylaan, 29 June 2016 Design team Organization and stakeholders

2 An Ambitious Vision 1. To connect the city on both sides of the ring road in all aspects (socially, spatially, in quality) 2. To make the ring a quality destination that adds to the brand of Amsterdam 3. Redirect demand from the older part of the city to the A10 (mobility, energy, housing and other functions) 4. Create a flexible model that can accommodate an ever-changing urban future Case Study Lelylaan, Amsterdam 2

3 A Starting Point 1. Retain existing infrastructure (not bigger, but smarter) 2. Increase capacity of A10 3. Incorporate existing plans in a coherent way 4. Realize a good share of the 90,000 apartments 5. The proposal must be realistic, profitable, and future oriented Case Study Lelylaan, Amsterdam 3

4 (transit traffic through A5) 2030 (distance between cars decreases) Destination Transit Cars per hour 5,000 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1, Morning peak Evening peak Off-peak Data Analysis Amsterdam urban development 13 Century 14 Century 15 Century 3,7 km single loop 4 intermediate stations - A10 HUB, Surinameplein, Vondelpark (x2) 0 new infrastructure needed - can be used on existing current infrastructure 16 Century 17 Century 19 Century 20 Century 21 Century - Development on the A10 11,3 min. single trip time 75 sec. vehicle frequency 24 passengers in every pod Morning peak Off-peak Saturday evening (21.00) Sunday afternoon (11.00) North South SOUTH Gradual increased demand on A10 West 25% increased efficiency due to smart mobility Diverting traffic from inner city roads to A10 West will still allow for lower levels than today s demand NORTH A10 West traffic destination A10 West traffic projected demand in 2030 Long distance traffic High demand Destination Amsterdam Local traffic Case Study Lelylaan, Amsterdam 4 Low demand

5 The Hub, a New Typology Lelylaan/A10 node stays in the same height/location Continue urban fabric between east and west Introducing a new multimodal hub Case Study Lelylaan, Amsterdam 5

6 Exit Nodes are the New Multi-Modal Hubs of the Future Buikslotermeer Ring Road 11 hubs Nodes become a transition area from long distance travel to short distance travel Sloterdijk Jan van Galenstraat Lelylaan Zeeburger eiland Cars HUB Bikes Underground metro Tram City pods Cars Zuidas RAI Gooiseweg Case Study Lelylaan, Amsterdam 6

7 Lelylaan Hub Railway Track A10 500m Suriname plein Transfer from long distance... Lelylaan Station Lelylaan HUB Lelylaan HUB will alleviate the stress of private transport in the inner city and will offer a connection to new modes of transport...to short distance 2getthere 3rd generation GRT Case Study Lelylaan, Amsterdam 7

8 Lelylaan Viaduct Existing Condition Existing Proposal Keep existing viaduct Close the hole Add two buildings Case Study Lelylaan, Amsterdam 8

9 Hub Transfer Traffic Flows A10 Lelylaan EXIT ENTRY RING ROAD RING ROAD M ENTRY EXIT Cars HUB Bikes Underground Metro Tram City pods Cars M Lelylaan A10 Case Study Lelylaan, Amsterdam 9

10 Hubs, on Multiple Floors +2m +5m +12m +50m A10 A A & B Parking Hub A Parking Hub A Parking Hub A Parking Hub A Parking Hub B Parking Hub B Parking Hub B Parking Hub B A & B B Case Study Lelylaan, Amsterdam 10

11 Hubs Programme 2 multimodal connectors 5 types of mobility 8 shops 2,500 parking spaces POD/ TRAM STATION PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE/ EXIT PUBLIC PROGRAM PARKING EXIT P PARKING ENTRANCE P A10 SIDE ROAD A10 SIDE ROAD LELYLAAN A10 Case Study Lelylaan, Amsterdam 11

12 Exit Nodes Become Power Plants Hemweg coal power plant kwh/day Rooftop/road solar panels 11 hubs cars kwh/day Use car batteries to cover the energy peak hours Windparks at the North sea Case Study Lelylaan, Amsterdam 12

13 The A10, Transforms Make the road flexible Introducing new residential density on both sides of the road Adding a drop off zone to access buildings on A10 and create a new city street Case Study Lelylaan, Amsterdam 13

14 Flexible Use of the A10 CURRENT SITUATION SHORT TERM FUTURE No flexibility Zipper On-demand lane direction LONG TERM FUTURE LED road Flexibility - on-demand lane direction - on-demand speed - on-demand traffic type - on-demand weather warning dir. South dir. North dir. South dir. North dir. South dir. North 7:00-9:00 17:00-19: mvt/2u mvt/2u mvt/2u mvt/2u 7:00-9:00 17:00-19:00 EXTRA LANE mvt/2u mvt/2u mvt/2u mvt/2u 7:00-9:00 17:00-19:00 REALTIME DATA INPUT Case Study Lelylaan, Amsterdam 14

15 Amsterdam Urban Expansion of the 21st Century Inner city development is favoured over suburban sprawl Lelylaan Amsterdam urban development 13 Century 14 Century 15 Century 16 Century 17 Century 19 Century 20 Century 21 Century - Development on the A10 Case Study Lelylaan, Amsterdam 15

16 A New City Street Profile side lanes emergency lanes highway lanes highway lanes emergency lanes side lanes m m existing situation 41 m 65 m m pedestrian connection new building new building new building parking parking drop off flexible lanes drop off new building 10 m 41 m 10 m new proposal Case Study Lelylaan, Amsterdam m

17 Suriname plein Lelylaan HUB Lelylaan Station This could be the future of the Ring zone s urban development Case Study Lelylaan, Amsterdam 17

18 Building Next to the Highway Existing To be demolished New Postjesweg Postjesweg A10 A10 Lelylaan A10 A10 Lelylaan Heemstedestraat Heemstedestraat Existing Proposal Case Study Lelylaan, Amsterdam 18

19 Introducing 8,400 New Homes AREA 2 AREA 1 Buildings GFA Amount of units Area 1 128, m 2 1,427 Area 2 160, m 2 1,778 Area 3 229, m 2 2,552 Area 4 187, m 2 2,079 Area 5 51, m AREA 4 756, m2 8, ,000 m² 8,400 units (90 m 2) value AREA 3 Acquisition Cost: Demolishion Cost : Construction Cost: Total Project Cost: Indicative Value: Average unit size: 90 m 2 443,000,000 26,500,000 2,102,250,000 2,571,750,000 2,943,150,000 AREA 5 Development Value: 371,400,000 New buildings along the A10 West Case Study Lelylaan, Amsterdam 19

20 Connections East/West A5 spooronderdoorgang s102 Transformatorweg Quantity of connections is very good with a tunnel or bridge every 200m on average Quality of connections is very bad. Low tunnels, monofunctional connections and desolated areas make the area feel unsafe Bridge typology solution Create a continuous street profile Tunnel typology solution Add interactive LED lighting A10 west Condensatorweg Spooronderdoorgang Changiweg Velserweg Wiltzanghlaan Leeuwendalersweg Erasmusgracht Jan Evertsenstraat Jan Voermanstraat Piet Mondriaanstraat Postjesweg Marius Bauerstraat Anton Waldorpstraat Johan Jongkindstraat Schipluidenlaan Lidewijdepad s103 Haarlemmerweg s104 Bos en Lommerweg s105 Jan van Galenstraat s106 Lelylaan A10 west Ring Road Slotervaart Heemstedestraat Rijswijkstraat Voorburgstraat Vlaardingenlaan 06 s107 Henk Sneevlietweg Overschiestraat A4 A10 zuid Case Study Lelylaan, Amsterdam 20

21 Lelylaan Today Case Study Lelylaan, Amsterdam 21

22 Lelylaan Tomorrow Case Study Lelylaan, Amsterdam 22

23 A10 Today Case Study Lelylaan, Amsterdam 23

24 A10 Tomorrow Case Study Lelylaan, Amsterdam 24

25 Amsterdam A10 Case Study Lelylaan, 29 June 2016 Design team Organization and stakeholders