Mediawijsheid Feit, Fake of Filter: hoe word jij beïnvloed? 21 November 2016 Jack de Swart

Transcriptie

1 Mediawijsheid Feit, Fake of Filter: hoe word jij beïnvloed? 21 November 2016 Jack de Swart

2 Kennismaken Professional Manager Docent Student Ambtenaar / beleidsmaker Onderzoeker Anders?

3 Kennismaken (deel 2)

4 Week van de mediawijsheid

5

6

7

8

9 Criminaliteit (CBS, 2013)

10 Cybercrime (CBS, 2013) Identiteitsfraude Koop- en verkoopfraude Hacken Cyberpesten

11 Cyberpesten

12 Cyberpesten Fotomisbruik (smartphone of webcam) of nepfoto Bedreigingen via internet Uitgescholden of buitengesloten Haatprofiel of nepaccount Bangalijsten Etc..

13 Tijd Programma Locatie Inloop Forum 1e verdieping Welkomstwoord door dr. Jack de Swart(lector Social Work) F Presentatie onderzoek Social Media / Cyberpesten door Ines Schell-Kiehl en Nicole Ketelaar F Pitches van tools, spellen en website ter bevordering van mediawijsheid. F Interactief programma (ronde 1) Spel Sociale Slimmeriken (Groot Emaus) Spel Wees wijs, beslis zelf (Spelwijs) Aktion Sicheres Internet! (trainingen voor social work professionals, docenten en ouders) en jongeren coachen jongeren tegen cyberpesten en online agressie (Juuuport e.v.) Workshop dilemma s rondom social media in social work. F3.31 W0.14 F2.83 W Interactief programma (ronde 2) Spel Sociale Slimmeriken (Groot Emaus) Spel Wees wijs, beslis zelf (Spelwijs) Aktion Sicheres Internet! (trainingen voor social work professionals, docenten en ouders) en jongeren coachen jongeren tegen cyberpesten en online agressie (Juuuport e.v.) Workshop dilemma s rondom social media in social work. F3.31 W0.14 F2.83 W Afsluiting door Hans Weusthof (directeur AMM)en lunch. Restaurant

14 Lingua franca Euregio

15 Digitale Interaktion/Interactie

16 Fact, Fake or Filter? Cyberbulling as a new social challenge for social workers Ines Schell Kiehl Nicole Ketelaar Social work Saxion, University of Applied Sciences

17

18 How many hours are Social Work students offline? Answer % Count Less than 8 hours 25% hours 43% hours 17% hours 15% 9 Total 100% 60

19 Cyberbullying Relative new research topic Number of publications is increasing rapidly Psychological perspective More disciplinary breadth would be desirable Built on research regarding traditional bullying Personal expierence of the aggressive act by the target

20 Risk factors for involvment in cyberbullying There are risk factors for involvement in cyberbullying Using the internet for more hours a day Using web cams Giving passwords to friends Involvement in verbal of physical school aggression Several Incidents of cyberbullying have their origins in school events/relationships Parental rules regarding Internet use Findings about demographic characteristics are ambivalent

21 Context of Cyberbullying Up to now research on cyberbullying is focused on: Context of schools General healthy adolescents Though, few effective interventions are known so far Less attention for the context of cyberbullying and social work Focus of our research: The professional actions regarding cyberbullying The perspective of vulnerable groups The education of young Social Work professionals

22 Quantitative study (NL) focused on perspective of pupils (11-15) in regular education Overview studies Quantitative study (NL) focused on development questionnair for young people with special needs Study focused on perspective of youngsters (16-17) with special needs and professionals social work(nl) Study focused on Euregional compareness September 2015 September 2016 September 2017 Qualitative study (NL) focused on perspective of teachers (N= 15) in special education Qualitative study focused on perspective of social workers (NL/GER) Study focused on perspective of youngsters (10-18) with special needs and professionals social work (GER) Questionaire among Saxion students (NL) focus on thier use and experince with Social Media Participation in YOWOMO2.0 International pilot with 7 other countries

23 Pending issues Questionnaire School Pupils (NL) years N = 268 Victims Bullies Victim-bully Bystanders 93

24 Answer Pending issues Students Social Work % (n) Man/Boy 22% (13) 80% (78) Pupils in special education % (n) Woman/Girl 78% (47) 20% (19) Total 100% (60) 100% (97)

25 Using daily Online Games Pending issues Students Social Work % (n) 8% (5) 51% (49) What sapp 98% (59) 63% (61) Pupils in special education % (n) Facebook 88% (53) 35% (34) 97% (58) 11% (11) Total 100% (60) 100% (97)

26 Pending issues Answer % Count I am not or barly online 21% hours online 38% hours online 18% 17 Longer than 6 hours online 24% 23 Total 100% 97

27 Pending issues Youngsters, particularly clients in child welfare institutions can t see the consequences of their online behaviour Children / youngsters seems to are getting younger Parents have (quite often) a part of getting things worse in problematic behaviour or problems regarding to cyberbuylling There does not seem to be a coordination between school, neighborhood, child and family

28 Social Work and Cyberbullying School Youngsters Social Work Parents

29 Thank you! We wish you an inspirational morning! Ines Schell-Kiehl Nicole Ketelaar

30 Aktion Sicheres Internet & juuuport e.v. Lokaal/Raum: F283 Christina ter Glane

31 Sociale Slimmeriken Lokaal/Raum: F331 Erica van Harn

32 Wees wijs, beslis zelf! Lokaal/Raum: W014 Martine Kroezen/ Chantal Voorhuis

33 Fallbeispiele/Casuïstiek Cyberbullying Lok aal/raum: W155 Nicole Ketelaar/ Ines Schell-Kiehl